Factors influencing Community Healthcare Worker’s adoption of mobile health technology (mhealth): A case of sangini supportive supervision (sangini) app, Uttar Pradesh, India






CHWs, TAM, Self-efficacy, Mhealth, Sangini, ASHAs, Humans, Telemedicine

Dimensions Badge



Short Article



Background: Community Health Workers (CHWs) are agents in delivering primary healthcare.  mhealth is being used to improve their performance. However, there are little evidences on factors influencing adoption of technology. Henceforth, sangini app was undertaken for analysis. Objective: To investigate factors of adoption of sangini app among users and non-users. Methods & statistical analysis: Constructs from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Self-Efficacy (SE) were used as tools for study. The study used an experimental study design Kaushambi and Pratapgarh districts of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.), India was selected as intervention and control groups respectively. The study sample consisted of CHWs i.e. 90 Sangini and 270 ASHAs. Two sample t test with equal variances and univariate regression analysis was applied. Results: TA and SE were predicators however; individual characters didn’t impact adoption of mhealth. Conclusion: There is need to comprehend factors influencing adoption of mhealth to improve performance of CHWs.

How to Cite

Juneja S, Kumar A. Factors influencing Community Healthcare Worker’s adoption of mobile health technology (mhealth): A case of sangini supportive supervision (sangini) app, Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J Community Health [Internet]. 2021 Sep. 30 [cited 2022 Oct. 4];33(3):519-22. Available from: https://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/2162


Download data is not yet available.


Maher D, Cometto G. Research on community-based health workers is needed to achieve the sustainable development goals. [Editorial] Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94: 786. Available from:https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/94/11/16-185918/en/

Jaskiewicz W, Tulenko K. Increasing community health worker productivity and effectiveness: a review of the influence of the work environment. Human resources for health. 2012;10(1):1-9. Available from:https://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1478-4491-10-38

Kahn JG, Yang JS, Kahn JS. ‘Mobile’health needs and opportunities in developing countries. Health affairs. 2010;29(2):252-8. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0965

Hu PJ, Chau PY, Sheng OR, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of management information systems. 1999;16(2):91-112. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247

Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003. Available from:https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly. 1995:189-211. Available from:https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/249688.pdf?casa_token=0L-l6UHYTkoAAAAA:B92aE9CXu2RShUcLnGDgJ-jwAQaYmB04O-iJ5mCkfOILmIQyHAMgd20p3BbTn6TzdP0FX4rlVnmYnNgjIK9YQBv0KVuwAxiM8AA2s0RpOSrlCWTLYG86KA

Gandoy-Crego M, Clemente M, Gómez-Cantorna C, González-Rodríguez R, Reig-Botella A. Self-efficacy and health: the SEH scale. American journal of health behavior. 2016;40(3):389-95. Available from:https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.40.3.11

NRHM, n.d., Handbook of ASHA Facilitators.Available from:http://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/communitisation/asha/Handbook_for_ASHA_Facilitators.pdf

Catholic Relief Services (CRS). ReMiND Project M-HEALTH SOLUTIONS TO SUPPORT ASHA SANGINIS FOR MATERNAL &CHILD SURVIVAL. [internet]. 2017 [cited 06 may 2017]. Available from https://www.crs.org/sites/default/files/toolsresearch/asha_sangini_crs_2pager_6may17.pdf

Zhang X, Han X, Dang Y, Meng F, Guo X, Lin J. User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance. Informatics for Health and Social Care. 2017;42(2):194-206. Available from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053