Role of Artistic Copper-T Shiksha Model to sensitize women for the use of Copper–T as a safe contraceptive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2023.v35i04.014Keywords:
Child; Male, Female, Copper, Family Planning Services, Neurolinguistic Programming, Privacy, Touch, Contraception, Contraceptive Agents, Intrauterine Devices, Counselling, Risk Assessment, UterusAbstract
The contraceptives are integral part of healthy sexual life. The choice of contraceptives depends on family planning and will of couple specially woman. Copper-T, an intrauterine device (IUD) is one of the most effective, cheapest and reversible contraceptive methods. It can be used for both spacing and birth control and it has minimum side effects as compared to other contraceptives. But it is highly neglected contraceptive though Copper- T has High pearl index and has less failure rate than other temporary contraceptive methods. As most of women are unaware of its potential significance & refuse it after misconception of perforation of uterus and expulsion. Copper-T Shiksha Model is innovative way of contraceptive counselling by artistic presentation to female and her family even in presence of children. It is based on the Arts Integration Approach and Neuro-linguistic programming. Copper-T is promoted as ornament of uterus instead of sharp object and displayed beautifully with a framed painting with significant meaning of contraception by famous artist Rahul Bhandare. Woman is also warned of side effects of Copper-T and conditions like excessive bleeding. It boosts up faith and confidence in contraceptive method. Both hand cards and clinic model is used in awareness. 400 women were selected randomly in group meets, door to door survey and individual counselling.
Downloads
References
Verónica Arancibia, Claudia Pena, Herbert E Allen, Gustavo Lagos, Characterization of copper in uterine fluids of patients who use the copper T-380A intrauterine device, 2003;332(1-2):69-78.
Maria Elena Ortiz, Horacia B corixatto , Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action, 2007;75(6 Suppl):S16-30.
Bliss Kaneshiro & Tod Aebey, Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device, 2010;2:211-20.
Justine P. Wu, Sarah P, Extended use of the intrauterine device: a literature review and recommendations for clinical practice, 2014;89(6):495-503.
Janina Kaislasuo, Oskari Heikinheimo, Pekka Lahteemaki, Satu Suhonen, Predicting Painful or Difficult Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulligravid Women, 2014;124(2Pt 1): 345-353
Hideo Takahashi, Krista M Puttler, Cheuk Hong Alexander L Ayzengart, Sigmoid Colon Penetration by an Intrauterine Device: A Case Report and Literature Review,2014;179(1):e127-9
David Hubacher, Sonia Lillo, Ana Zepeda, Pai-Lien Chen, Horacio Croxatto, Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: Randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen,2006 Nov;195(5):1272-7
K Iyenger, S D Iyenger, The Copper-T 380A IUD: A ten-year alternative to female sterilisation in India, 2000;195(5):1272-7.
Anil Arslan, Mine Kanat Pektas, Huseyin Yesilyurt, Umit Bilge, Colon penetration by a copper intrauterine device: a case report with literature review, 2009:27993):395-7
Damrong Rienprayura M. D., S Phaosavasdi, P Somboosuk, Cervical perforation by the copper-T intrauterine device, 1973;7(6):515-21
E. Caliskan, N Ozturk, B O Dilbaz, S Dilbaz, Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices, 2003;8(3):150-5
Tessa Madden, Colleen McNicholas,Qiuhong Zhao, Gina M Secura,David L Eisenberg,Jeffrey F Peipert, Association of Age and Parity with Intrauterine Device Expulsion, 2014;124(4):718-26
Daniel W. Cramer, G B Hutchison, W R Weltch, R E Scully, R C Knapp, Factors Affecting the Association of Oral Contraceptives and Ovarian Cancer,1982;307(17):1047-51
Catherine d’arcangues et al, Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception, 2007;75(6 Suppl):S2-7
Aruna Nigam, Ayesha Ahmad, Anshu Sharma, Poonam Saith, Swaraj Batra, Postpartum Intrauterine Device Refusal in Delhi: Reasons Analyzed, 2018;68(3):208-213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Seema Goyal, G. B. Singh, Ranju Singla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
