AI and Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare: A Narrative Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2025.v37i05.002

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Health Care Delivery, Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is multidisciplinary field that explores the dynamic interaction between human with human-like across social, cognitive, ethical, and technical dimensions. This review synthesises benefits and challenges faced in AI-HRI in the field of healthcare, categorising the literature into various thematic areas like social interaction and emotional engagement in children, mitigating social isolation in elderly,  ethical considerations, reducing burden on healthcare workers, rehabilitative robots, surgical robots and eventually increasing the efficiency of workflow in hospitals. Foundational works establish the significance of autonomy, collaboration, and multimodality. At the same time, recent studies emphasised the significance of empathy, user acceptance, and the subtle impact the robots can have in social and domestic settings. Ethical analysis highlights both potential risks and benefits of AI-HRI, particularly in special group of population like specially-abled children, elderly, etc.  Application-based research further highlights the importance of robots in service-related to healthcare, and hospitality environments. Affective computing helps create systems that understand emotions, making interactions with technology feel more natural and human-like. Together, these insights chart a comprehensive landscape of HRI, informing the benefits and risks of socially and ethically responsible robotic agents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khan ZH, Siddique A, Lee CW. Robotics utilization for healthcare digitization in global COVID-19 management. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Jun;17(11):3819.

Wang XV, Wang L. A literature survey of the robotic technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of manufacturing systems. 2021;60:823-36.

Fiorini L, Cavallo F, Dario P. The role of coherent robot behavior and embodiment in emotion perception and recognition during human-robot interaction: experimental study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024;11:e45494.

Jecker NS. You’ve got a friend in me: sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics. Ethics Inf Technol. 2020;22(3):183–190.

Bartneck C, Belpaeme T, Eyssel F, Kanda T, Keijsers M, Šabanovi? S. Human-Robot Interaction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2024. doi:10.1017/9781009424202.

Agadi K, Dominari A, Tebha SS, Mohammadi A, Zahid S. Neurosurgical management of cerebrospinal tumors in the era of artificial intelligence: a scoping review. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2023;66(6):632-41.

Su H, Qi W, Chen J, Yang C, Sandoval J, Laribi MA. Recent advancements in multimodal human–robot interaction. Front Neurorobot [Internet]. 2023 May 11 ;17.

Holland J, Kingston L, McCarthy C, Armstrong E, O’Dwyer P, Merz F, et al. Service Robots in the Healthcare Sector. Robotics [Internet]. 2021 Mar;10(1):47.

Pashevich E. Can communication with social robots influence how children develop empathy? Best-evidence synthesis. AI & Soc [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1;37(2):579–89.

Soares FO, Costa SC, Santos CP, Pereira APS, Hiolle AR, Silva V. Socio-emotional development in high functioning children with Autism Spectrum Disorders using a humanoid robot. Interaction Studies [Internet]. 2019 Oct 7;20(2):205–33.

Lee D, Kim K, Saduakas A, Ismatullaev U, Kim J, Garza BB. Dynamic personalities for elderly care robots: user-based recommendations. IASDR Conference Series [Internet]. 2023 Oct 9;

Di Nuovo A, Broz F, Wang N, Belpaeme T, Cangelosi A, Jones R, et al. The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly. Intel Serv Robotics [Internet]. 2018 Jan 1;11(1):109–26.

Koceska N, Koceski S. Supporting elderly’s independent living with a mobile robot platform. jucs [Internet]. 2022 May 28;28(5):475–98.

Asgharian P, Panchea AM, Ferland F. A Review on the Use of Mobile Service Robots in Elderly Care. Robotics [Internet]. 2022 Dec;11(6):127.

Cantone AA, Esposito M, Perillo FP, Romano M, Sebillo M, Vitiello G. Enhancing Elderly Health Monitoring: Achieving Autonomous and Secure Living through the Integration of Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Robots, and Sensors. Electronics. 2023; 12(18):3918.

Chiu CJ, Hsieh S, Li CW. Needs and Preferences of Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Taiwan for Companion Robots and Pets: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e23471.

Smarr CA, Mitzner TL, Beer JM, Prakash A, Kemp CC, Rogers WA. Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6(2):229–47.

Villarreal-Zegarra D, Yllescas-Panta T, Malaquias-Obregon S, Dámaso-Román A, Mayo-Puchoc N. Effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Therapy and Pet-Robot Interventions in Reducing Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2024;103023.

Tulsulkar G, Mishra N, Thalmann NM, Lim HE, Lee MP, Cheng SK. Can a humanoid social robot stimulate the interactivity of cognitively impaired elderly? A thorough study based on computer vision methods. Vis Comput [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):3019–38.

Bodenstedt S, Wagner M, Müller-Stich BP, Weitz J, Speidel S. Artificial intelligence-assisted surgery: potential and challenges. Visceral Medicine. 2020 Dec 4;36(6):450-5.

Zhou XY, Guo Y, Shen M, Yang GZ. Application of artificial intelligence in surgery. Frontiers of medicine. 2020 Aug;14(4):417-30.

Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, Efron PA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, Rashidi P, Upchurch GR, Bihorac A. Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA surgery. 2020 Feb 1;155(2):148-58.

Lu J. Will Medical Technology Deskill Doctors? IES [Internet]. 2016;9(7):130.

Aquino YSJ, Rogers WA, Braunack-Mayer A, Frazer H, Win KT, Houssami N, et al. Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills. International Journal of Medical Informatics [Internet]. 2023;169:104903.

Bicer EK, Fangerau H, Sur H. Artifical intelligence use in orthopedics: an ethical point of view. EFORT open reviews. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):592-6.

Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Annals of surgery. 2018 Jul 1;268(1):70-6.

Satapathy P, Hermis AH, Rustagi S, Pradhan KB, Padhi BK, Sah R. Artificial intelligence in surgical education and training: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations–correspondence. International Journal of Surgery. 2023 May 1;109(5):1543-4.

Hoff T. Deskilling and adaptation among primary care physicians using two work innovations. Health Care Management Review. 2011 Oct 1;36(4):338-48.

Akingbola A, Adegbesan A, Ojo O, Otumara JU, Alao UH. Artificial intelligence and cancer care in Africa. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;3:100132.

Yang GZ, J. Nelson B, Murphy RR, Choset H, Christensen H, H. Collins S, Dario P, Goldberg K, Ikuta K, Jacobstein N, Kragic D. Combating COVID-19—The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases. Science robotics. 2020 Mar 25;5(40):eabb5589.

Kumar B, Sharma L, Wu SL. Job allocation schemes for mobile service robots in hospitals. In 2018 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM) 2018 Dec 3 (pp. 1323-1326).

Jie Z, Zhiying Z, Li L. A meta-analysis of Watson for Oncology in clinical application. Scientific reports. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5792.

Wootton R, Geissbuhler A, Jethwani K, Kovarik C, Person DA, Vladzymyrskyy A, Zanaboni P, Zolfo M. Long-running telemedicine networks delivering humanitarian services: experience, performance and scientific output. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2012;90:341-7D.

Jennett PA, Hall LA, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2003;9(6):311-20.

Naveen Reddy KP, Harichandana U, Alekhya T, S. M. R. A Study of Robotic Process Automation Among Artificial Intelligence. IJSRP [Internet]. 2019 Feb 12 [cited 2025 Jul 21];9(2):8651.

Kyrarini M, Lygerakis F, Rajavenkatanarayanan A, Sevastopoulos C, Nambiappan HR, Chaitanya KK, Babu AR, Mathew J, Makedon F. A survey of robots in healthcare. Technologies. 2021 Jan 18;9(1):8.

Tsai AY, Carter SR, Greene AC. Artificial intelligence in pediatric surgery. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery [Internet]. 2024 Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jul 15];33(1):151390.

Pedreschi D, Giannotti F, Guidotti R, Monreale A, Ruggieri S, Turini F. Meaningful Explanations of Black Box AI Decision Systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. 2019 Jul 17 [cited 2025 Jul 15];33(01):9780–4.

Bekbolatova M, Mayer J, Ong CW, Toma M. Transformative Potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, Applications, and Navigating the Ethical Landscape and Public Perspectives. Healthcare [Internet]. 2024 Jan;12(2):125.

Shah P, Thornton I, Kopitnik NL, Hipskind JE. Informed Consent. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics. Jonathan Pugh, Oxford University Press (2020). © Jonathan Pugh. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198858584.001.0001

Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T, Dharanikota S. Patients’ Perceptions Toward Human–Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study. JMIR [Internet]. 2021 Nov 25;23(11).

Rimmer L, Howard C, Picca L, Bashir M. The automaton as a surgeon: the future of artificial intelligence in emergency and general surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun;47(3):757–62.

Morris MX, Fiocco D, Caneva T, Yiapanis P, Orgill DP. Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research. Frontiers in Surgery. 2024 May 9;11:1393898.

Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, Aldairem A, Alrashed M, Bin Saleh K, Badreldin HA, Al Yami MS. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC medical education. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689.

de Graaf MMA. An Ethical Evaluation of Human–Robot Relationships. Int J of Soc Robotics [Internet]. 2016 Aug 1;8(4):589–98.

Prescott TJ, Robillard JM. Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships. iScience. 2021 Jan 22;24(1):101993.

Ley M. Care Ethics and the Future of Work: a Different Voice. Philos Technol [Internet]. 2023 Jan 26;36(1):7.

Puzio A. Not Relational Enough? Towards an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics. Philos Technol [Internet]. 2024 Mar 20;37(2):45.

Mennella C, Maniscalco U, De Pietro G, Esposito M. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 29;10(4).

Chen A, Wang C, Zhang X. Reflection on the equitable attribution of responsibility for artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and treatment decisions. Intelligent Medicine. 2023 May 28;3(02):139-43.

Shahid J, Ahmad R, Kiani AK, Ahmad T, Saeed S, Almuhaideb AM. Data Protection and Privacy of the Internet of Healthcare Things (IoHTs). Applied Sciences [Internet]. 2022 Jan;12(4):1927.

Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Elendu TC, Jingwa KA, Okoye OK, Okah MJ, Ladele JA, Farah AH, Alimi HA. Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine. 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36671.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

1.
Jena N, Taywade M, Jasani K, Joshi K. AI and Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare: A Narrative Review. Indian Journal of Community Health [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 31 [cited 2026 Feb. 19];37(5):637-43. Available from: https://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/3379

Issue

Section

Review Article

Dimensions Badge

Most read articles by the same author(s)