Smartwatches as Assistive Technology: Evidence and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2025.v37i06.005Keywords:
Smartwatches, Assistive Devices, Activities of Daily Living, Telemonitoring, Wearable Electronic DevicesAbstract
Watches have evolved from simple timekeeping devices into powerful tools supporting daily living. With rapid technological advances, wearable devices increasingly promote independence and comfort. In the United States, adoption has grown substantially, with recent Health Information National Trends Survey data showing that about one in three adults (33%) uses a wearable device, including smartwatches and fitness trackers. This review examines how smartwatches enhance independent living and quality of life, particularly for individuals with functional impairments. Equipped with biosensors, wireless connectivity, and intelligent algorithms, smartwatches function as wearable assistive technologies. They enable real-time health monitoring, activity tracking, emergency alerts, cognitive reminders, medication adherence support, fall detection, and environmental awareness for individuals with sensory impairments. For children and older adults, GPS tracking and connectivity features help maintain caregiver communication. These combined capabilities improve safety, autonomy, and daily routine management. Despite challenges such as limited battery life, sensor accuracy concerns, and data security risks, smartwatches remain promising assistive tools. Future advancements in artificial intelligence, improved sensor integration, and stronger validation may enhance personalization and reliability. As technology evolves, smartwatches are positioned to become integral components of the assistive technology ecosystem, offering accessible and user-friendly solutions that support independence, safety, and effective health management.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.2001 [cited 26 May 2025]. Available from : https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Goyal I, Rana S, Rani G, Senjam SS, Singh R. Redefining assistive technology: a shift from disability to functional impairments in policy and practice. Indian J Community Health. 2025;37(2):343–6.
Cecchinato ME, Cox AL, Bird J. Smartwatches: the good, the bad and the ugly? In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM; 2015. 2133 -8
Bogár B, Pet? D, Sipos D, Füredi G, Keszthelyi A, Betlehem J, Pandur AA. Detection of Arrhythmias Using Smartwatches-A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;12(9):892. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090892.
Mielke M, Brück R. AUDIS wear: A smartwatch based assistive device for ubiquitous awareness of environmental sounds. 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA; 2016. pp. 5343-5347, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591934.
Statista. Number of smartwatch users worldwide from 2019 to 2025 [Internet]. Statista; 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109054/worldwide-smartwatch-users/
Ehrler F, Lovis C. Supporting elderly homecare with smartwatches: advantages and drawbacks. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:667–71.
World Health Organization. WHO global cooperation on assistive technology (GATE): Assistive technology fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.2001 [cited 26 May 2025]. Available from : https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Junker H, Amft O, Lukowicz P, Tröster G. Gesture spotting with body-worn inertial sensors to detect user activities. Pattern Recognit. 2008;41(6):2010–24.
Haescher M, Trimpop J, Matthies DJC, Bieber G, Urban B, Kirste T. aHead: considering the head position in a multi-sensory setup of wearables to recognize everyday activities with intelligent sensor fusions. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer; 2015. p. 741–52.
Correa A, Munoz Diaz E, Bousdar Ahmed D, Morell A, Lopez Vicario J. Advanced pedestrian positioning system to smartphones and smartwatches. Sensors (Basel). 2016;16(11):1903.
Mitra S, Acharya T. Gesture recognition: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C. 2007;37(3):311–24.
Pylvanainen T. Accelerometer-based gesture recognition using continuous HMMs. In: IbPRIA (1); 2005. p. 639–46.
Vukovi? M, Car Ž, IvšacPavlisa J, Mandi? L. Smartwatch as an assistive technology: tracking system for detecting irregular user movement. Int J E-Health Med Commun. 2018;9(1):23–34.
Personal health assistance for elderly people via smartwatch based motion analysis. [Cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319328150_Personal_Health_Assistance_for_Elderly_People_via_Smartwatch_Based_Motion_Analysis
World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2020: Monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
Lutze R, Waldhör K. Personal health assistance for elderly people via smartwatch based motion analysis. In: 2017 IEEE Int Conf on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI); 2017 Aug 23. p. 124–33.
Zhang D, Shen X, Qi X. Resting heart rate and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2015;188:E53–63.
Chastin S, Mandrichenko O, Helbostadt J, Skelton D. Associations between objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults: the NHANES study. Bone. 2014;64:254–62.
Jain D, Ngo H, Patel P, Goodman S, Findlater L, Froehlich J. SoundWatch: exploring smartwatch-based deep learning approaches to support sound awareness for deaf and hard of hearing users. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '20);Virtual Event, Greece. New York: ACM; 2020. p. 1–13.
Dot Watch. 2017. Available from: [https://dotincorp.com/shop/product/](https://dotincorp.com/shop/product/) (Cited 2025 June 5).
Krüger F, Nyolt M, Yordanova K, Hein A, Kirste T. Computational state space models for activity and intention recognition: a feasibility study. PLoSOne. 2014;9(11):e109381.
Gjoreski H, Bizjak J, Gams M. Using smartwatch as telecare and fall detection device. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE); 2016. p. 242–5. doi:10.1109/IE.2016.55
da Silva AKF, Barbosa MPCdRdC, Vanderlei FM, Christofaro DGD, Vanderlei LCM. Application of heart rate variability in diagnosis and prognosis of individuals with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Ann NoninvasiveElectrocardiol. 2016;21:223–35.
Rajakariar K, et al. Accuracy of smartwatch pulse oximetry measurements in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024;2(1):152–8.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Do not use smartwatches or smart rings to measure blood glucose levels: FDA Safety Communication [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2024 Feb 21 [cited 2025 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/do-not-use-smartwatches-or-smart-rings-measure-blood-glucose-levels-fda-safety-communication
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manu Sharma; Salaj Rana, Suresh Reddy kancharla, Vishnu VY, Sandeep Singh, Suman Badhal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
